Legal Opinion
Salamy v. Bruce
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 30, 1929No. 3338PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
On.December 22,1926, N. F. Salamy obtained a judgment against W. B. Bruce, in cause No. 64 in the district court of Hutchinson county, Tex., which is as follows:
“This day in the above entitled and numbered cause, wherein N. F. Salamy, doing business as Amarillo Wholesale Grocery Co., is plaintiff, and W. L. Bruce is defendant, came the plaintiff, by his attorney, and the defendant by his attorney in fact, Ove Over-son, and a power of attorney being duly filed in this court by which it appears that the said Ove Overson is appointed attorney in fact of the said W. L. Bruce, defendant, for him,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Switzer v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- De Witt County v. WischkemperTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Dean v. State Ex Rel. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Cotton v. RheaTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Johnson v. HanscomTexas Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campsey v. BrumleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Terrell v. Alpha Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Lloyds Alliance v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Glenn v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- O'Banion v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.