Legal Opinion

Wyant v. Russell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1923No. 17841PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The error here assigned is that the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error and in rendering judgment dismissing the petition in error..

The transcript of the docket and journal entries of the Court of Appeals discloses: September 14, 1922, plaintiff in error filed his petition in error, summons was issued, and service made; December 1, 1922, the cause dismissed for want of prosecution; December 20, 1922, application for a rehearing denied; December 27, 1922, “This cause being on November 22, 1922, called for trial, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wells v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Terwoord v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wagner v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Tims v. Holland Furnace Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Duncan v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API