Legal Opinion

Terwoord v. Harrison

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1967No. 40488PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The order which was before the Court of Appeals for review was the order overruling the motion to vacate the default judgment. Since the motion was made during term, the trial court had the inherent right, founded upon the common law, to sustain or overrule the motion to vacate that judgment. Moherman v. Nickels, 140 Ohio St. 450, 143 A.L.R. 1174.

The Court of Appeals, in ruling on the propriety or impropriety of that order, had only to rule upon the limited question of whether or not the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to vacate the order. Such abuse of discretion must appear in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moherman v. NickelsOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wagner v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wyant v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doddridge v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Miley v. STS Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Altman v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Spotsylvania Mall Co. v. NobaharOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Hall v. SilverOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API