Legal Opinion

Tims v. Holland Furnace Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1950No. 31804PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Two questions arise upon this appeal. First, may the Court of Common Pleas, for good cause shown and in the exercise of sound discretion vacate a judgment, during the term in which it was rendered and before an appeal has been instituted, to permit the preparation and timely filing of a bill of exceptions and later, during the same term, enter a new judgment, from the date of which latter judgment, the time for perfecting an appeal will begin to run? Second, does the vacation of a vacatur followed by the entry of a new judgment resurrect and reinstate the original judgment?

It is axiomatic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Porter v. Boston Storage Warehouse Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Moherman v. NickelsOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. National Tube Co. v. AyresOhio Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Doggett v. ALABAMA SECURITIES COM'N.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Haman v. McHenry CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McMillen v. Willard Garage, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API