Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Roesch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1891No. 14,186PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

— This opinion, in which we all concur, was prepared by the late Judge Mitchell, and expresses the views and judgment of the court.

Roesch sued the railroad company to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been suffered on account of the negligent failure of the company in supplying dangerous and defective machinery and appliances, about which the plaintiff was required to work.

It appears that at the time of sustaining the injury complained of the plaintiff was in the employ of the railroad company, and was, with a number of other employees, engaged as a trackman, under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Jenney Electric Light & Power Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bradbury v. GoodwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railway Co. v. HanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. EastmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Levey v. BigelowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API