Forest Preserve District v. First National Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schostok
In December 1999, the plaintiff filed this condemnation action against the defendants, seeking to take 204 acres of land in Naperville (the Property). Approximately eight years later, a jury found that just compensation for the taking was $10,725,000, based on the fair market value of the Property in 1999. The defendants appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in: (1) granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of whether the plaintiff met its obligation to negotiate in good faith before filing suit; (2) granting the plaintiffs motion in limine to bar certain evidence;…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forest Preserve District v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Schandelmeier-Bartels v. The Chicao Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Village of Bellwood v. American National Bank and Trust CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. GrohneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- FOREST PRESERVE DIST. v. First Nat. BankIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.