Legal Opinion
City of Scottsdale v. CGP-Aberdeen, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 6, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0304PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶1 CGP-Aberdeen, L.L.C. (“CGP”) challenges the constitutional adequacy of the compensation it received for a fifty-acre parcel of real property that was condemned by the City of Scottsdale (“Scottsdale”). The United States Constitution requires that a property owner be paid just compensation in the amount of the value of the property as of the date it is taken from the owner. Arizona law values the property in a direct condemnation action as of the date of the summons initiating the condemnation action. Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1123(A) (2003). CGP…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Commodities Trading Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Forest Preserve District v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Cardi American Corp. v. All American House & Apartment Movers, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Az Electric Power v. Djl 2007Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.