Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. of Newark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1941No. 28387PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Under date of May 22, 1936, defendant, a foreign corporation, entered into a contract of insurance with plaintiff, under the terms of which defendant obligated itself to assume all liability not exceeding five thousand dollars for personal injuries to one person by reason of the ownership and/or use of a Dodge sedan owned by plaintiff. The insurer further agreed to investigate at its own cost any accident reported to it, and to settle any claim as the insurer deemed advisable, and, if action were brought against the assured on account of an accident, to defend such action in the name and on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. Best Building Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Tyger River Pine Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Georgia Casualty Company v. MannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rudco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Henke v. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API