Legal Opinion

Dimino v. Secretary of the Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 23, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The plaintiffs initiated this action seeking a declaratory judgment and an order in the nature of mandamus in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County. They contend that the Attorney General erred in certifying that a citizens’ initiative petition to eliminate toll collections on certain Massachusetts roads did not concern matters “excluded” from the initiative process under art. 48, The Initiative, Part n, § 3, of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth. A single justice of this court reserved decision and reported the case for consideration by the full court. We agree…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Milo M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Abdow v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. In re CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Rinaldi v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Wotan v. KeganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API