Dimino v. Secretary of the Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The plaintiffs initiated this action seeking a declaratory judgment and an order in the nature of mandamus in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County. They contend that the Attorney General erred in certifying that a citizens’ initiative petition to eliminate toll collections on certain Massachusetts roads did not concern matters “excluded” from the initiative process under art. 48, The Initiative, Part n, § 3, of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth. A single justice of this court reserved decision and reported the case for consideration by the full court. We agree…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Milo M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Abdow v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- In re CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Rinaldi v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Wotan v. KeganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.