Legal Opinion

Rinaldi v. State Building Code Appeals Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 6, 2002No. 00-P-1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

We consider in this appeal whether Anthony Rinaldi was an “interested person” entitled to notice, see G. L. c. 143, § 100, and 780 Code Mass. Regs. § 122.3.4 (1997), of a public hearing before the State Building Code Appeals Board (board), as required by the “reasonable notice” provisions of the State Administrative Procedure Act. See G. L. c. 30A, § 11. We conclude that the notice provisions of G. L. c. 143, § 100, are governed by G. L. c. 30A, § 11, and that Rinaldi was entitled to notice. We reverse a judgment of the Superior Court *669that entered on the basis that there was lawful notice of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Foley v. Lowell Sun Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grady v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Kramer v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Craig v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. JOHN EARLEY v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIONMassachusetts Superior Court · 2022
  5. Knott v. Town of NorthbridgeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API