Legal Opinion

Dooley v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1987No. EAB 86-AB-1072 and 86-AB-1072A; CA A41818PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board order adopting the referee’s order that denied her claim for unemployment compensation on the ground that she had voluntarily left work without good cause. We reverse.

The referee made these findings:

“(1) Claimant worked for employer from July 13, 1981 through March 5,1986. She last worked as a vocational aide/ clerk at employer’s work activity center. (2) Claimant had initially worked as a collection center attendant, then as a lead person in the special production area, and then applied for and was selected for the vocational aide…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Stevenson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Ruiz v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Pauly v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Ferguson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Marion County v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Douglas County v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Newman v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API