Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1987No. EAB 86-AB-10; CA A38626PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*611VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board order denying him unemployment benefits.1 EAB concluded that he had voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c).2 EAB’s decision is reviewable only for substantial evidence to support its findings and to determine if there is a rational connection between the findings and the conclusions. Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Employment Division, 74 Or App 530, 702 P2d 1162 (1985); Balduyck v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 242, 245, 695 P2d 944 (1985). We must affirm the decision unless the findings and conclusions are not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCann v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Cook v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Grigsby v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Wilton v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cavitt v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Dooley v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Pinto v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Hunt v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Cavitt v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API