Layman v. Swanson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by A. B. Layman and D. E. Walker, copartners, against Alfred Swanson and Anna Swanson, his wife, E. K. Hjelvik and Ethel Hjelvik, his wife, Elmer Swanson, Jay Swanson, and Walter Swanson, to recover the value of a gas donkey engine, and damages resulting from its conversion. Defendants, by their answer, denied that they converted the donkey engine, and alleged that they were in lawful possession of it at the time conversion is claimed. They further alleged that no demand for its return was made upon them.
Defendant Alfred Swanson died after this action was commenced,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Webster v. BeauWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Nelson v. TroyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Davin v. DowlingWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- J. H. & C. K. Eagle, Inc. v. KunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Williams v. RedingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Paris American Corp. v. McCauslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- COLUMBIA PARK GOLF v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Columbia Park Golf Course, Inc. v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.