Legal Opinion

McCollum v. O'NEILL

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1955No. 9239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

On September 7, 1950, plaintiffs were operating a ladies’ ready-to-wear store in tbe Arcade Building at Malta.

Defendants were at that time building contractors jointly engaged in remodeling tbe front of the Arcade Building under a contract with the owner, Mrs. Larcombe.

On September 7th steam escaped from the pipes of the Arcade Building, causing damages to plaintiffs’ stock in trade.

This action was brought to recover the damages thus caused.

The amended complaint alleges that defendants in the prosecution of their work negligently and carelessly disconnected the radiators…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Angerman Co., Inc. v. Edgemon Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Olds v. HinesOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Surman v. CruseMontana Supreme Court · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Covington Bros. v. Valley Plastering, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. LeCompte v. WardellMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Sornsin Construction Co. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hensley v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API