Legal Opinion
Webcor Packaging Corporation, a Michigan Corporation v. Autozone, Inc., a Nevada Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 23, 1998No. 96-2106PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J., joined by Nelson, J.,
RYAN, J. (p. 361), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
The parties in this case have framed the issue as one of first' impression: whether the “ultimate purchaser” of unique goods may be considered as the buyer for purposes of the specially manufactured goods exception to *355the statute of frauds. We conclude that the district court was correct in its reliance upon the circumstances of manufacture. In doing so, we take this opportunity to refine and extend the analysis of the district court.
I
We recite the undisputed facts of this case relying heavily…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Waxman v. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Motts, Inc. of MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1978
- Colorado Carpet Installation, Inc. v. PalermoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Company Image Knitware, Ltd. v. Mothers Work, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- RIJ PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. v. Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Busch v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Skywalker Communications of Indiana, Inc. v. Skywalker Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.