Legal Opinion
Company Image Knitware, Ltd. v. Mothers Work, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2006No. 1861 WDA 2005, 1895 WDA 2005PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
TODD, J.:
¶ 1 In this breach of contract action, Mothers Work, Inc., appeals the judgment entered in favor of Company Image Knit-ware, Ltd. (“CIK”) and Perma Lift Cor-setería, S.A. De C.V. (“PLC”) (collectively “Appellees”), and Appellees cross-appeal. We affirm. 1
¶ 2 The extensive factual background of this case, based on the detailed factual findings of the Honorable Marilyn J. Hor-an, is as follows. CIK is a U.S. garment manufacturing company owned and operated by Clarence B. Williams. PLC is a Mexican garment manufacturing company, with its business headquarters in Mexico City,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Weavertown Transport Leasing, Inc. v. MoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- S.K.C. v. J.L.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Quinn v. BuppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Partners Group Financial, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.