Legal Opinion
Waxman v. Luna
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1989No. Nos. 88-5407, 88-5548PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs filed this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Plaintiffs are seeking to recover medical and hospital expenses that they claim are due them because of their participation in the Hardaway Construction Company, Inc., Employee Benefit Plan (Hardaway Plan). Subsequent to a trial, the district court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and determined that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear this action because plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Short v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Maurine M. Holt v. William W. WinpisingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Taylor and Gaskin, Inc. v. Chris-Craft IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Kline v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Kuper v. IovenkoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Bartling v. Fruehauf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.