Legal Opinion

State v. . Carlson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1916PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant was indicted for obtaining money by false pretense, in that he represented to one Dr. David J. Fuller "that the stock of the Hendersonville Traction Company could be bought for $20,000, and no less," and that "he, the said C. A. Carlson, had $10,000, and that if the said David J. Fuller would furnish the other $10,000, he, said C. A. Carlson, would purchase all of the said stock in said Hendersonville Traction Company, and that they would hold it jointly and unencumbered," which it is alleged in the indictment was false, and which defendant knew to be false, as "he did not have…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. . PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API