Legal Opinion
Kersting v. Hardgrove
Somerset County Circuit Court, N.J.
Decided July 12, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Leyden, C. C. J.
Defendant moves to strike the various counts of the complaint, assigning eight reasons therefor, only two of which seem to merit consideration.
The complaint contains eighteen counts, each seeking redress for an overcharge for rent, which overcharge is alleged to be contrary to the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 N. S. O. A. Appendix, §§ 901, ei seq., relating to the maximum rent regulation.
The summons was tested at Somerville on the 9th day of April, 1946. The overcharges set forth in the first six counts of the complaint occurred more…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BurnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Demosse v. ShimmelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Imbrie v. MarshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950