Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2011No. 53973Published

1Opinion of the Court

267 P.3d 48 (2011)

CITY OF OAKLAND, Appellant,

v.

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Respondent.

No. 53973.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

August 4, 2011.

Porter Simon, PC, and Brian C. Hanley and Peter H. Cuttitta, Reno, for Appellant.

Robison Belaustegui Sharp & Low and Frank C. Gilmore, Reno, for Respondent.

Before the Court En Banc.

OPINION

By the Court, CHERRY, J.:

This appeal involves an attempt by appellant City of Oakland to enforce, in Nevada, a California civil judgment against respondent Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. We consider whether the California judgment is entitled to full faith and credit…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API