Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2011No. 53973Published

1Dissent

Pickering, J., with whom Douglas, C.J., and Hardesty, J., agree,

dissenting:

A Nevada judgment on a gambling debt is entitled to enforcement in a sister state, even though the sister state has statutes that outlaw gambling and prohibit judicial enforcement of gambling debts. MGM Desert Inn, Inc. v. Holz, 411 S.E.2d 399, 401-03 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991) (citing the Full Faith and Credit Clause analysis in Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 237 (1902), and the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act). I would extend the same reciprocal courtesy to the California judgment presented here. True, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API