City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Cherry, J.:
This appeal involves an attempt by appellant City of Oakland to enforce, in Nevada, a California civil judgment against respondent Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. We consider whether the California judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in Nevada. Recognizing that Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U.S. 657 (1892), provides an exemption to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, such that other states’ penal judgments are unenforceable in the state of Nevada, we conclude that the California judgment in this case was penal in nature…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Nelson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CLARK CTY. VS. ELIASON (NRAP 5)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Oakland v. Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011