Legal Opinion
Mogen David Wine Corp. v. Borenstein
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Sec. 268.02 (1), Stats., provides as follows:
“(1) When it appears from his pleading that a party is entitled to judgment and any part thereof consists in restraining some act, the commission or continuance of which during the litigation would injure him,-or when during the litigation it shall appear that a party is doing or threatens or is about to do, or is procuring or suffering some act to be done in violation of the rights of another party and tending to render the judgment ineffectual, a temporary injunction may be granted to restrain such act.” (Italics supplied.)
The foregoing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beidenkopf v. Des Moines Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Consolidated Vinegar Works v. BrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Calvert Distillers Corp. v. GoldmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ManskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Werner v. A. L. Grootemaat & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Bartell Broadcasters, Inc. v. Milwaukee Broadcasting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Shearer v. CongdonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.