Bartell Broadcasters, Inc. v. Milwaukee Broadcasting Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The attorneys for John Michael Hornbach contend that the first order is not appealable. They point out that an application for leave to intervene in an action is a special proceeding and that an order made in a special proceeding, to be appealable, must be a final order. Sec. 274.33 (2), Stats.
The order permitting intervention determines no final rights of any of the parties and in no way precludes ultimate judgment for or against any of the parties from which an appeal can be taken. The plaintiff in effect admits this contention but states that many orders, not of themselves appealable, may…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vredenburg v. Safety Devices Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Culligan, Inc. v. RheaumeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Mogen David Wine Corp. v. BorensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. ManskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Werner v. A. L. Grootemaat & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Mercury Records Productions, Inc. v. Economic Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.