Legal Opinion

Florence v. Hiatt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1991No. 891SC1257PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

On 7 September 1988, plaintiff was cited for exceeding 35 m.p.h. in a 35 m.p.h. zone. He did not appear to answer the charge on the scheduled court date and the Dare County Clerk’s Office sent notice of failure to appear to the Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV), which, pursuant to G.S. § 20-24.1, revoked plaintiff’s driving privilege for failure to appear and answer the charge. The revocation was effective as of 1 January 1989. Plaintiff complied with the revocation on 6 February 1989.

On 27 January 1989, plaintiff was cited for a safe movement violation and was also charged with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PledgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Shore v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Barbour v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walters v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Evans v. UDR, INC.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. YonceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Mace v. NC Dep't of Ins.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. Mace v. NC Dep't of Ins.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API