Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Scheidt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1957No. 449PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The appellant took no exception to any finding of fact or to the signing of the judgment. He merely gave notice of appeal to 'this Court. Consequently, our review is limited to the question as to whether the findings of fact are sufficient to support the judgment and whether error of law appears on the face of the record. City of Goldsboro v. R. R., ante, 101; Bailey v. Bailey, 243 N.C. 412, 90 S.E. 2d 696; Dellinger v. Bollinger, 242 N.C. 696, 89 S.E. 2d 592; In re Blalock, 233 N.C. 493, 64 S.E. 2d 848; Gibson v. Insurance Co., 232 N.C. 712, 62 S.E. 2d 320.

G.S. 20-24(c) contains the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. John Dowdican's BailMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Arbuckle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maguire v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. State v. PledgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Suspension of Operator's License of Levin v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Florence v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Jose Guzman Gonzalez v. Jefferson Sessions IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API