Laubach v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Rulon, C.J.:
Petitioner Roger Laubach appeals the summary denial of his pro se petition for relief. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.
The material facts are as follows:
In late 1999, the petitioner sought medical treatment for poor eyesight. He was referred to Dr. Ziemianski, a retinal specialist, who indicated that the petitioner’s retinas functioned within the normal limits. In February of 2000, the petitioner was examined by Dr. Reifschneider, who referred the petitioner to a neuro-ophthalmologist, Dr. Wuster at the University of Kansas Medical Center. Dr. Wuster found no significant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richard Ray Layton Billy R. Penny v. Ted Elder, as County Judge of Montgomery County, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Minix v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Litzinger v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- CORTER v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Astorga v. Leavenworth County SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.