Legal Opinion

Laubach v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 28, 2004No. 91,329PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Petitioner Roger Laubach appeals the summary denial of his pro se petition for relief. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

The material facts are as follows:

In late 1999, the petitioner sought medical treatment for poor eyesight. He was referred to Dr. Ziemianski, a retinal specialist, who indicated that the petitioner’s retinas functioned within the normal limits. In February of 2000, the petitioner was examined by Dr. Reifschneider, who referred the petitioner to a neuro-ophthalmologist, Dr. Wuster at the University of Kansas Medical Center. Dr. Wuster found no significant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Richard Ray Layton Billy R. Penny v. Ted Elder, as County Judge of Montgomery County, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Minix v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  2. CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Litzinger v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. CORTER v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  5. Astorga v. Leavenworth County SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API