State v. Waldbillig
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaut, C. J.
Because the automobile was searched without a warrant and was not searched at the time that defendant and its other occupants had been arrested and before they had been taken to the police station, the Supreme Court of the United States requires a state court to suppress as evidence all the items found as a result of that search. See Preston v. United States (1964), 376 U. S., 364, 11 L. Ed. (2d), 777, 84 S. Ct., 881; Stoner v. California (1964), 376 U. S., 483, 11 L. Ed. (2d), 856, 84 S. Ct., 889. Cf. Ker v. California (1963), 374 U. S., 23, 10 L. Ed. (2d), 726, 83 S. Ct., 1623.
However, it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. WhitmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. SpawOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Warrensville Hts. v. TothOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. StottsOhio Court of Appeals · 1966