Legal Opinion

State v. Spaw

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1984No. 4-83-19 and -20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.

These appeals by the state of Ohio are from judgments rendered by the Court of Common Pleas of Defiance County suppressing evidence seized by police authorities after search of a motor vehicle under the purported authority of search warrants issued out of the trial court.

The vehicle, of which ownership was not claimed by either of the defendants, was, prior to its impoundment and the search and seizure following impoundment, driven by the defendant Lee E. Nolan with the defendant Jerry L. Spaw as a passenger. Neither Nolan nor Spaw claimed ownership of the personal property, consisting of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Larry Wyder, United States of America v. Sherman Burton MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. WaldbilligOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. KuykendallOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Freedman v. America Online, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  3. State v. Carpenter, Ca2005-11-494 (10-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. PellegriniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API