State v. Stotts
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHitnsioker, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law by Willie Stotts from a judgment of guilty of the offense of carrying concealed weapons. Stotts was represented by court-appointed counsel in the trial court, and by another court-appointed counsel in this court. The complaint in this court is:
“The court erred in overruling the motion to suppress the evidence obtained by search of the defendant; and erred in permitting the introduction of brass knuckles into evidence.”
In this case, as in nearlv all criminal cases, there is a great conflict in the testimony. The jury were entitled to believe all or any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willie Stotts v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970