Legal Opinion

State v. Stotts

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1966No. 5823PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHitnsioker, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law by Willie Stotts from a judgment of guilty of the offense of carrying concealed weapons. Stotts was represented by court-appointed counsel in the trial court, and by another court-appointed counsel in this court. The complaint in this court is:

“The court erred in overruling the motion to suppress the evidence obtained by search of the defendant; and erred in permitting the introduction of brass knuckles into evidence.”

In this case, as in nearlv all criminal cases, there is a great conflict in the testimony. The jury were entitled to believe all or any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willie Stotts v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API