Legal Opinion

Hellman v. Thiele

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1987No. Civ. 11323PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion to amend the complaint and from a partial summary judgment dismissing some of their claims against Security State Bank of New Salem, Antone Goetz, Allyn Lennie, and Delores Maier [hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Bank”]. The Bank filed a cross-appeal. We affirm the order denying the motion to amend the complaint; affirm that part of the judgment which dismisses claims of the plaintiffs; dismiss that part of the cross-appeal which challenges denial of summary judgment; and remand for further…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Hillesland v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Thiele v. Security State Bank of New SalemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Farmers State Bank v. AntonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Olson v. FraaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Erickson v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Bank of Kenmare v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dewey v. LetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. BrakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API