Legal Opinion

First Security Co. v. Huddle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1934No. 448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*243OPINION

By BARNES, J.

Under the agreed statement of facts, it appears that the tobacco crop at the time of the execution of the conditional sales note to the plaintiff Huddle on May 27, 1931 was not yet planted, but was planted between the tenth and fifteenth day of June of the same year.

It further appears from the agreed statement of facts that no part of the $165 conditional sales note has been paid to the plaintiff Huddle. As we view the question, even if we consider the conditional sales note as a chattel mortgage so far as it refers tq the seven acres of tobacco, it was an attempt to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norwood Savings Bank v. RomerOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HooverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  2. Northwestern Mut L Ins v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Shott v. FalknorOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API