Legal Opinion

Norwood Savings Bank v. Romer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1932No. 4051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The question for decision is: Does a pledge in a real estate mortgage, pledging rents and profits, reach the rents and profits accruing before condition broken?

It is settled law that a mortgage is a mere security in the hands of the mortgagee and does not convey any interest in the land itself. After mortgage conditions have been broken, the mortgagee may bring an action for possession, or an action in foreclosure, resulting in judicial sale. There is no question but that after condition broken, the mortgagee, upon bringing an action for foreclosure and making to the court a showing of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co. v. BeginOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Hunter (In Re Sam A. Tisci, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. First Security Co. v. HuddleOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Varnau v. ScanlonOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Hodapp v. HodappOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API