Legal Opinion

Shott v. Falknor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1965No. 622Published

1Opinion of the CourtCrawpord, J.

Plaintiff, appellant herein, brought this action for conversion of a corn crop. He appeals from a judgment for defendant, appellee herein.

The trial court’s findings of fact are accepted as true. On May 18, 1962, plaintiff received from one George Manuel a promissory note for $77,000 loaned, together with a chattel mortgage to secure the same. The mortgage recited that it covered “All of the growing crops, emblements which are in the soil and are now growing on the farm located in the County of Montgomery,” etc.

At that time the corn had not yet been planted. The planting did not begin until…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Security Co. v. HuddleOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API