Legal Opinion

United States v. S.S. Marine Courier

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The respondents object to libelants’ motion for the issuance of letters roga-' tory upon interrogatories and cross-interrogatories on the ground that only an oral examination of the proposed witnesses will adequately protect their interests. There can be no doubt that face-to-face questioning of witnesses is a more desirable method of eliciting the truth.1 But ofttimes practical consideration compels the litigants to be content with less effective means of inquiry. Upon the argument it was indicated that the amount involved in this litigation hardly warrants the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  2. Worth v. Trans World Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. Branyan v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Lago Oil & Transport Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  5. Encyclopædia Britannica Co. v. Werner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API