Legal Opinion

Encyclopædia Britannica Co. v. Werner Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided May 31, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On complainant’s application for a commission for taking depositions of foreign witnesses.

1Opinion of the Court

TANNING, District Judge.

The complainant has, on due notice,, applied to this court for a commission to take the testimony of witnesses residing in London, England, upon written interrogatories and cross-interrogatories. The defendants insist that they be permitted to conduct their cross-examination orally. The question is as to the power of the court and the proper practice in such a case.

Both parties agree that the application is not made under the provisions of section 863 of the United States Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 661]. That section plainly authorizes depositions de…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bischoffscheim v. BaltzerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
  2. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GilletteUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  3. Bird v. HalsyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1898
  4. United States v. Fifty Boxes & Packages of LaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  5. Western Division of Western N. C. R. v. DrewUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The TitanicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  2. Ktistakis v. The Liberian S.S. StarDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
  3. United States v. S.S. Marine CourierDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API