Legal Opinion

Branyan v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 20, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, in four separate actions commenced against the same defendant, move pursuant to Rule 28(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for the issuance of letters rogatory, directed to the Courts of India, for an oral examination and cross-examination of thirty-seven named witnesses and for the production of books, papers and records in their control.

The plaintiffs in each action are the widow and children respectively of four American journalists who were killed while passengers in an airplane owned and operated by the defendant, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Reynolds v. United States. Brauner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. V. O. Machinoimport v. Clark Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Brauner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Lago Oil & Transport Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. In Re Anschuetz & Co., GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Terry v. Modern WoodmenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
  4. Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Tomingas v. Douglas Aircraft Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API