Ntamere v. DecisionOne Corp.

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

This matter is before the court of appeals on certiorari review from a decision of the commissioner of the Department of Employment and Economic Development. 1 The commissioner’s representative concluded under Minn.Stat. § 268.095, subd. 1 (2002), that because relator quit his employment, and because relator’s reasons for quitting did not constitute an exception to disqualification, relator was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation.

Relator, a pro se appellant, contends that he was unable to present his case because DecisionOne failed to comply…