Legal Opinion
G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 27, 2003No. 01 Civ. 0216 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Baron & Budd, P.C. (“Baron & Budd”), Frederick Baron (“Baron”) and Russell Budd (“Budd”) (collectively the “Baron & Budd defendants”) have moved for the second time pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 56.1 to dismiss Counts V, VI and XII of the Fourth Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) of plaintiff G-I Holdings (“Holdings”). Holdings has moved in opposition for the second time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) for a continuance to allow for further discovery.
At the time of the Baron & Budd motion, Holdings had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Messina v. MazzeoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. 21st Century Transport Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- G-I Holding, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003