Legal Opinion
G-I Holding, Inc. v. Baron & Budd
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 2003No. 01 Civ. 0216 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Baron & Budd, P.C. (“Baron & Budd”), Frederick Baron (“Baron”) and Russell Budd (“Budd”) (collectively the “Baron & Budd defendants”) have moved for the third time pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 56.1 to dismiss Counts V, VI and XII of the Fourth Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) of plaintiff G-I Holdings (“Holdings”). Holdings has moved in opposition for the third time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(f) for a continuance to allow for further discovery.
For the reasons set forth below, the Baron & Budd…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Angelo J. Gaetano, Richard P. Evans, John Does I, Ii, and IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Commercial Cleaning Services, L.L.C. v. Colin Service Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Phyllis MELOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holmes v. LorchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004