Legal Opinion

Simmons Et Ux. v. Evans Et Ux

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1947PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

This is an appeal from the action of the Chancellor in sustaining a demurrer to the bill of complaint filed by ap pellants, L. E. Simmons and wife, hereinafter called corm plainants. The purpose of the hill was to have rescinded on the ground of fraud a sale of a residence to complainants by appellees, hereinafter called defendants, and a recovery of the purchase price of $6,000. Appropriate preliminary injunctions to protect alleged rights were granted. The bill was filed promptly upon the discovery of the alleged fraud and therein the complainants offered to put the defendants in statu quo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. M'gavockTennessee Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Hill v. HarrimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Southern Brass & Iron Co. v. Exeter Mach. WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wright v. DufieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Fries v. GannonOhio Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXVI Limited Partnership v. Bluff City Community Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  2. Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Fahrner v. SW Manufacturing, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API