Southern Brass & Iron Co. v. Exeter Mach. Works
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields
This suit is brought to recover damages for breach of implied warranty of the quality and capacity of a hoisting engine and attachments bought by the complainant from the Exeter Machine Works for the East Tennessee Iron & Coal Company.
The facts necessary to be stated are as follows: About August 6,1900, the East Tennessee Iron & Coal Company ordered from the complainant a double cylinder, single-drum hoisting engine; the drum to be large enough to hold 3,200 feet of %-inch wire rope, and the engine of sufficient capacity and power to haul 15 empty coal cars, weighing 12,000 pounds, up a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harkleroud v. NaveTennessee Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simmons Et Ux. v. Evans Et UxTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Isaacs v. BokorTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Bevins v. LivesayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
- Hawkins v. ByrnTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Elbinger Shoe Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.