Legal Opinion

Perkins v. M'gavock

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1813PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Chancery. The bill charged that the complainant and defendant held eight hundred acres of land as tenants in common on which there was a valuable spring, and that the defendant represented that should an equal division of quantity take place the spring would fall in the western part.

Read the full summary

Chancery. The bill charged that the complainant and defendant held eight hundred acres of land as tenants in common on which there was a valuable spring, and that the defendant represented that should an equal division of quantity take place the spring would fall in the western part. That the partition did take place, and that the complainant gave the defendant for a choice of parts a horse worth one hundred dollars and his note for two hundred and fifty dollars more, believing that the spring, from the representation of the de-defendant, would be in the western division, which was chosen by…

1Opinion of the CourtOveRTON, J.

delivered the following resolution of the Court. By the proof it appears that on running the divisional line agreeably to the partition, the spring will fall six poles'within the eastern half; but there is no evidence that the defendant or his agent represented the spring would be within the western division, nor is there any proof of conversations or facts tending to show that the defendant or his agent knew the spring would not fall in that division.

Under the circumstances of this case the Court cannot perceive that there is any ground upon which the complainant can be relieved. Mr. Randal…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simmons Et Ux. v. Evans Et UxTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. GuestHouse International, LLC v. Shoney's North America Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  3. Linda Sue Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  4. Smith v. PFIZER INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
  5. Bearden v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API