Fries v. Gannon

In the municipal court, where this case originated, plaintiff in error was the plaintiff and defendant in error was the defendant. The action was brought for damages arising because of false representations made by the defendant to the plaintiff, which substantially affected the value of the property sold by her to him and the price paid for same.

There was a written contract between the parties and the representations claimed to be false are included therein. Said contract is as follows:

*388“Cincinnati, O., Oct. p, ipió.

“I hereby offer to purchase the following described property:

“A lot fronting…