Legal Opinion

Parodi v. Budetti

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1999No. 31225PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Raymond J. Parodi (Parodi) filed actions asserting claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit and foreclosure on a mechanic’s lien against respondents Frank and Loretta Budetti (Budettis). Although the net verdict on the claims favored Parodi, the district court awarded attorney’s fees and costs to the Budettis based upon an oral offer of judgment. Parodi contends the district court erred when it determined the Budettis to be the prevailing party for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees and costs of suit. We agree.

FACTS

Parodi contracted with the Budettis to supply labor…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Edwards Industries, Inc. v. DTE/BTE, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nelson v. Peckham Plaza PartnershipsNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Morgan v. DemilleNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Close v. Isbell Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keystone Elevator Co. v. Johnson & Wales UniversitySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. U.S. Design & Construction Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 357Nevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Valley Electric Ass'n v. OverfieldNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. N. Nev. Homes, LLC v. GL Constr., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API