Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Peckham Plaza Partnerships

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1994No. 23395PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*24OPINION

By the Court,

Shearing, J.:

Appellants Gail Nelson and Chuan Liu leased property from respondent Peckham Plaza Partnerships (“Peckham”), and operated a Mongolian Barbecue restaurant (“Panda”) on the premises. After five years, the lease expired and Panda vacated the premises and removed some of its equipment. Peckham was not satisfied with the condition of the property as it was left by Panda, and incurred expenses in repairing and restoring the property.

The district court awarded Peckham damages and attorneys’ fees based on Panda’s negligent removal of the equipment and on the damaged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. Blanchard Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hermann v. Varco-Pruden BuildingsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Frantz v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sandy Valley Associates v. Sky Ranch Estates Owners Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bobby Berosini, Ltd. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. S.O.C., Inc. v. Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API