Hooker v. Burr
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiff Hooker was the purchaser at foreclosure sale of land which had been mortgaged by the Spencers. Defendant Rhodes, by assignment, had become the owner of a judgment which one Nicholls had recovered against Anna T. Spencer (in whom the legal title to the mortgaged property stood). Nicholls's judgment was docketed in October, 1897. The mortgaged property was sold upon the 13th of June, 1898. Rhodes, as substituted judgment creditor under the Nicholls judgment, claimed his rights as redemptioner, and, by payment to the sheriff, effected a redemption of the mortgaged property, in due time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Jessup v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Spiegel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Texas Mutual Life Insurance v. TolbertTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.