Legal Opinion
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Hvidsten
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1964No. 39,278PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or for a new trial.
Defendants are father and son engaged in farming in Marshall County in this state. Rilco Laminated Products Division is a division of Weyerhaeuser Company, a corporation, plaintiff in this action, and for the purposes of this case Weyerhaeuser Company and Rilco Laminated Products Division may be considered one and the same and will be referred to as Rilco.
In the early part of 1960, defendants became interested in constructing a potato warehouse in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Schlecht v. SchlechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In Re Minnesota Kicks, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Koch v. Han-Shire Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Central Ready Mix Co. v. John G. Ruhlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966