Goldstein v. Gee

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to support the verdict, and the judge did not err in overruling the general grounds of the motion for a new trial.

In special grounds 4 and 6 of the motion, complaint is made on certain charges of the court to the effect that, if the plaintiff was riding as an invited guest in an automobile operated by another, and the plaintiff had no right to control, direct, or govern the operation of the automobile, the negligence of the driver would not be imputable to the plaintiff. It was held in Southern Railway…