Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Landrum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1964No. 40389PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

In special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial error is assignéd upon the ground 'that the verdict is contrary to a specified portion of the charge of the court. “An assignment of error that a verdict is contrary to the charge of the court, or to a portion thereof, is in effect merely an assignment that the verdict is contrary to law, and presents no'question for decision. Roberts v. Keeler, 111 Ga. 181 (6), 184 (36 SE 6Í7)) Wight v. Schmidt, 111 Ga. 858 (36 SE 937); Napier v. Burkett, 113 Ga. 607 (38 SE 941); Fryer v. State, 12 Ga. App. 533 (77 SE 830); Lamb v.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Crown Cotton Mills v. McNallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Rogers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Chandler v. GatelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Union Camp Corp. v. HelmySupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API